Comments on: WCF Configuration Complexity http://winterdom.com/2007/02/wcfconfigurationcomplexity by dæmons be driven Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:02:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Nap http://winterdom.com/2007/02/wcfconfigurationcomplexity/comment-page-1#comment-1249 Nap Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:28:41 +0000 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/wcfconfigurationcomplexity#comment-1249 I was wondering, I created a WCF service but on the client side, I used the wizard to create a web reference to consume the service. Since the web reference is a different way to consume the service than pure WCF, I do not have any configuration set to the app.config. I do have a Web_Reference folder that has lots of stuff which I am not aware of. what they do. I was wondering, I created a WCF service but on the client side, I used the wizard to create a web reference to consume the service. Since the web reference is a different way to consume the service than pure WCF, I do not have any configuration set to the app.config. I do have a Web_Reference folder that has lots of stuff which I am not aware of. what they do.

]]> By: Santosh http://winterdom.com/2007/02/wcfconfigurationcomplexity/comment-page-1#comment-844 Santosh Thu, 28 May 2009 13:52:18 +0000 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/wcfconfigurationcomplexity#comment-844 very informative article clearly explaining whats the purpose of binding, behavior, end points. Me too was using WCF service for 2 years without ever understanding/caring what configuring each end point.behavior unless I ran into a problem, which I used to find the solution through the forums as you mentioned very informative article clearly explaining whats the purpose of binding, behavior, end points.

Me too was using WCF service for 2 years without ever understanding/caring what configuring each end point.behavior unless I ran into a problem, which I used to find the solution through the forums as you mentioned

]]> By: bryan costanich http://winterdom.com/2007/02/wcfconfigurationcomplexity/comment-page-1#comment-277 bryan costanich Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:24:07 +0000 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/wcfconfigurationcomplexity#comment-277 i can't believe this. this should have never been designed this way. it's completely non-intuitive and it goes against basic xml design rules. they should have looked at the WSE for design inspiration, because at least that is understandable. for that matter the whole WCF framework is just bizarre. i'm surprised that they missed the mark as far as they did in fact. yeah, there are legitimate gripes with a lot of stuff that was released in 1.0 and 2.0, but 3.0 is just a cluster. i can’t believe this. this should have never been designed this way. it’s completely non-intuitive and it goes against basic xml design rules. they should have looked at the WSE for design inspiration, because at least that is understandable.
for that matter the whole WCF framework is just bizarre. i’m surprised that they missed the mark as far as they did in fact. yeah, there are legitimate gripes with a lot of stuff that was released in 1.0 and 2.0, but 3.0 is just a cluster.

]]> By: Scott Seely http://winterdom.com/2007/02/wcfconfigurationcomplexity/comment-page-1#comment-276 Scott Seely Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:54:41 +0000 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/wcfconfigurationcomplexity#comment-276 When using config, all this is very confusing. I typically recommend that people DON'T edit these by hand but use the WCF Configuration Editor instead. If you have the SDK installed, VS will let you right click on the config file and choose "Edit WCF Configuration". This reduces the complexity immensely and allows you to get to the settings of interest much faster. When using config, all this is very confusing. I typically recommend that people DON’T edit these by hand but use the WCF Configuration Editor instead. If you have the SDK installed, VS will let you right click on the config file and choose "Edit WCF Configuration". This reduces the complexity immensely and allows you to get to the settings of interest much faster.

]]>