http://winterdom.com/2007/02/longrunningservicesandwsrm by dæmons be driven Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:28:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/longrunningservicesandwsrm/comment-page-1#comment-428 Tomas Restrepo Mon, 05 Mar 2007 04:48:56 +0000 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/longrunningservicesandwsrm#comment-428 Paul: I realize that, which is exactly why I mentioned I put the "blame" on WSRM itself. I understand that other implementations are persistent, but my argument was precisely that there's no guarantee that because a given platform implements WSRM it supports persistence, thus making it significantly less useful. Paul: I realize that, which is exactly why I mentioned I put the "blame" on WSRM itself. I understand that other implementations are persistent, but my argument was precisely that there’s no guarantee that because a given platform implements WSRM it supports persistence, thus making it significantly less useful.

]]> http://winterdom.com/2007/02/longrunningservicesandwsrm/comment-page-1#comment-427 Paul Fremantle Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:50:25 +0000 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/longrunningservicesandwsrm#comment-427 WSRM doesn't *enforce* persistence - but please remember that WCF is not the only implementation. For example, there is a persistent open source implementation of WSRM in WSO2's Web Services Application Server. Paul Fremantle, WS-RX TC Co-Chair WSRM doesn’t *enforce* persistence – but please remember that WCF is not the only implementation. For example, there is a persistent open source implementation of WSRM in WSO2’s Web Services Application Server.
Paul Fremantle,
WS-RX TC Co-Chair

]]> http://winterdom.com/2007/02/longrunningservicesandwsrm/comment-page-1#comment-426 DevHawk Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:34:42 +0000 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/longrunningservicesandwsrm#comment-426 You didn't misunderstand me. I want an interoperable open queued messaging platform. But I would like it to at least support SSB features that are over and above what standard MQ platforms provide (in order, conversations, conversation groups, end-to-end reliable messaging, etc) You didn’t misunderstand me. I want an interoperable open queued messaging platform. But I would like it to at least support SSB features that are over and above what standard MQ platforms provide (in order, conversations, conversation groups, end-to-end reliable messaging, etc)

]]>