http://winterdom.com/2007/02/bpelsupportforwf by dæmons be driven Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:02:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/bpelsupportforwf/comment-page-1#comment-299 Marc Mercuri Sun, 04 Mar 2007 22:14:09 +0000 http://winterdom.com/2007/02/bpelsupportforwf#comment-299 <i>if BPEL compatibility is an aspect you care about, you'll need to restrict yourself to a subset of the power of WF in order to remain compatible (and meaning being able to later export your WF workflows into BPEL). </i> True, however if you expose your workflows (BPEL or otherwise) as services, you have the ability to mix and match BPEL and Sequential/State Machine workflows, allowing you to both have the flexibility and power found in WF while maintaining 'pure BPEL' where required. if BPEL compatibility is an aspect you care about, you’ll need to restrict yourself to a subset of the power of WF in order to remain compatible (and meaning being able to later export your WF workflows into BPEL).
True, however if you expose your workflows (BPEL or otherwise) as services, you have the ability to mix and match BPEL and Sequential/State Machine workflows, allowing you to both have the flexibility and power found in WF while maintaining ‘pure BPEL’ where required.

]]>